Skip to Content

List screening for regional compliance

COX list screening checks a person or company against sanctions lists, OFAC, PEP registers, public procurement and risk sources in one search, and records which lists were consulted, when and against which edition. It is built for lawyers, accountants, real estate agents and other obligated entities that must prove every check.

Register my company | Register as a Professional

Sanctions and PEP screening
Global and regional sources
Local LATAM sources
Country-specific public records
Audit-ready evidence
Traceable results in every search
Pay only for what you use
Credit-based model, no fixed fees

What COX checks

List screening supports your due diligence with multiple source types. Each source plays a different role in your risk-based process.

Sanctions and restrictive lists

UN, OFAC, EU, UK and Canada sanctions programs. Depending on your jurisdiction, some of these lists may be binding for obligated entities.

PEP sources

Politically Exposed Persons from international and national sources, used to identify when enhanced due diligence applies.

Public procurement records

Government contracting sources such as SECOP II in Colombia, useful for supplier, bidder and contractor due diligence.

Disciplinary and fiscal responsibility sources

Public background sources such as disciplinary records and fiscal responsibility registries that help document third-party reviews.

Local reference lists

Country-specific control and reference sources, such as SAT 69-B in Mexico, used as risk assessment inputs.

International risk sources

Interpol notices and other international watch sources that support a broader risk picture of a counterparty.

Not every list has the same compliance effect

Understand the effect of each source before acting on a match. The applicable procedure depends on your jurisdiction, your internal compliance manual, and the competent authority.

Binding or restrictive lists

Some lists have direct legal effect for obligated entities depending on the jurisdiction. For example, in Panama, United Nations Security Council lists are binding and may trigger preventive freezing procedures for non-financial obligated subjects under the applicable framework.

Matches against binding lists should be escalated immediately following your internal procedures and the instructions of the competent authority.

Control or reference lists

Control and reference sources are risk assessment tools. A match does not automatically create preventive freezing or legal effects by itself. They help you evaluate exposure, apply enhanced due diligence, and document your decision.

In each country, the legal effect depends on the applicable law, the regulator, your internal policy, and the type of source.

Local public sources

Public records such as procurement platforms, disciplinary registries and fiscal responsibility databases help document due diligence on suppliers, contractors and third parties. They provide context, not automatic sanctions.

PEP and open sources

PEP sources indicate when enhanced due diligence may apply. Adverse media and open sources add context for risk evaluation. Matches should be reviewed, documented, and handled under the company's internal compliance manual.

🇨🇴 Colombia sources available in COX

Colombian public sources integrated for due diligence, risk evaluation and third-party, supplier, contractor and counterparty reviews.

PEP Función Pública PEP source

Colombian public officials and politically exposed persons declared through the Función Pública platform.

SIRI Procuraduría Background source

Disciplinary background records from the Procuraduría General de la Nación, useful for third-party background checks.

Contraloría Fiscal Responsibility Fiscal source

Fiscal responsibility public records from the Contraloría General de la República.

SECOP II Suppliers Procurement source

Registered suppliers in Colombia's public procurement platform, for supplier due diligence.

SECOP II Bidders Procurement source

Bidders and proponents in public contracting processes, for counterparty and contractor reviews.

SECOP II Electronic Contracts Procurement source

Electronic contract records in public procurement, for contracting history and third-party context.

These sources support due diligence and risk evaluation. They are not restrictive lists and a match does not create automatic sanctions or blocking.

Supported sources

Global sanctions programs, PEP sources and country-specific lists. Coverage may vary by country and configuration.

UN Sanctions

United Nations Security Council Sanctions Lists (UNSC 1267, 1373, 1988, 2253, 2331, 2388). Binding for obligated entities in jurisdictions such as Panama.

OFAC SDN Sanctions

US Treasury list of Specially Designated Nationals: people and companies owned or controlled by, or acting for, targeted countries, and designated terrorists and narcotics traffickers.

OFAC consolidated Sanctions

The rest of OFAC's sanctions programmes, excluding the SDN list.

European Union Sanctions

EU consolidated sanctions lists

United Kingdom Sanctions

UK consolidated sanctions lists

Canada Sanctions

Canadian sanctions lists consolidated from multiple sources

PEP PEP source

Politically Exposed Persons from multiple international and national sources

Panama Resolution 1373 Restrictive

Panama's implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1373

Panama CNBC 02-2018 Reference

Resolution 02-2018 of Panama's National Commission against Money Laundering, which publishes the list of politically exposed persons of Venezuela. A national control list.

SAT Mexico 69-B Reference

Mexican tax authority list used as a control and reference source for PLD and Vulnerable Activities contexts

Colombia 6 local sources

PEP Función Pública, SIRI Procuraduría, Contraloría fiscal responsibility, and SECOP II suppliers, bidders and electronic contracts

Interpol Reference

Interpol Red Notices and fugitive lists

DEA Reference

US Drug Enforcement Administration watch lists

FBI Reference

Federal Bureau of Investigation watch lists

Engel List Reference

US Congressional list of foreign actors linked to corruption

Bahamas Leaks Open source

Individuals and entities in leaked Bahamas papers

Internal List Custom

Customizable internal watchlist for your organization

Coverage may vary by country and configuration. Badges describe the typical role of each source; the legal effect depends on the applicable jurisdiction.

Coverage by country

COX adapts screening sources and compliance language to each jurisdiction.

Panama 🇵🇦

UN lists, Panama Resolution 1373 and local sources, with SSNF-oriented compliance for non-financial obligated subjects. In the Panama context, UN Security Council lists are binding and may trigger preventive freezing procedures under the applicable framework.

Learn more about Panama compliance

Mexico 🇲🇽

SAT 69-B as a control and reference source, in the PLD and Vulnerable Activities context, plus global sanctions and PEP sources.

Learn more about Mexico compliance

Colombia 🇨🇴

PEP Función Pública, SIRI Procuraduría, Contraloría fiscal responsibility, and SECOP II suppliers, bidders and electronic contracts for supplier and third-party due diligence.

Learn more about Colombia compliance

Ecuador 🇪🇨

Screening support with international sources, including the UN Security Council consolidated list, for obligated subjects that report to the UAFE. Local sources are not covered yet.

Learn more about Ecuador compliance

Guatemala 🇬🇹

Screening support with international sources for LD/FT due diligence. Local source coverage may vary by configuration.

Learn more about Guatemala compliance

Venezuela 🇻🇪

Global sanctions programmes and PEP sources for LC/FT/FPADM due diligence, including the list of politically exposed persons of Venezuela published by Panama’s CNBC.

Learn more about Venezuela compliance

Dominican Republic 🇩🇴

Screening support with international sources for non-financial obligated entities. Expanding local coverage.

Learn more about Dominican Republic compliance

How Matching Works

Precision matching with configurable thresholds for your compliance needs.

Match Types

Strict Match Recommended

Returns only results that match exactly in the same order and quantity of words entered.

Example: "José Luis Herrera" → José Luis Herrera

Most precise search - filters API results to show only exact name matches.

Exact Match

Returns results containing all the words you entered, but in any order.

Example: "José Luis Herrera" → José Luis Herrera, Herrera Luis José, Herrera José Luis, José Luis Maitan Herrera

Partial Match

Returns matches with at least one word in first or last name.

Example: "José Luis Herrera" → José Gabriel Herrera, Luis Contreras Herrera, Luis José Santana Herrera

Broad Match

Returns matches with words contained in a sequence.

Example: "Ana" → Anais, Anabel, Santana

Match Score Threshold

The Match Score determines how closely a result must match your search criteria. Higher values mean stricter matching:

≥95 Very Strict

Only near-perfect matches. Minimal false positives.

90-94 Strict (Recommended)

High confidence matches. Good balance for compliance.

80-89 Flexible

May include partial matches. Requires manual review.

<80 Risky

High false positive rate. Not recommended for compliance.

Every search leaves an audit trail

COX keeps traceable evidence of each screening so you can respond to audits, internal reviews and authority requests.

  • Searched name
  • Identification number when available
  • Source consulted
  • Date and time
  • Match status
  • Review decision
  • Supporting evidence
  • Reviewer notes

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you minimize false positives?

COX uses multiple strategies to reduce false positives:

  • Configurable Match Score Thresholds: Set higher thresholds (90-95+) to reduce borderline matches.
  • Match Type Selection: Use "Strict Match" for exact name searches when possible.
  • Name Variations: Our matching accounts for common name variations, nicknames, and abbreviations.
  • Manual Review: All potential matches should be reviewed by compliance staff before taking action.

Important: COX provides screening results as a tool. Compliance staff must make final determinations using additional information such as dates of birth, nationalities, and contextual factors.

Does a match mean I have to block or reject the client?

Not necessarily. The effect of a match depends on the type of source and your jurisdiction:

  • Binding or restrictive lists: in some jurisdictions, such as Panama for UN Security Council lists, matches may trigger specific procedures for obligated entities, including preventive freezing under the applicable framework.
  • Control or reference lists: support risk evaluation and enhanced due diligence. They do not automatically create legal effects by themselves.
  • Public and procurement sources: provide context for third-party and supplier reviews.

Always follow your internal compliance manual and the instructions of the competent authority in your country.

How are audit trails maintained?

Every screening search creates a complete audit trail including:

  • Date and time of search
  • User who performed the search
  • Search parameters (names, match type, threshold)
  • Results returned and match scores
  • Actions taken (discarded, marked as match, etc.)
  • IP address and device information

These audit trails are retained for regulatory reporting and can be exported for compliance reviews.

How frequently are the lists updated?

COX maintains frequent updates for all lists:

  • UN Sanctions Lists: Updated daily
  • OFAC SDN List: Updated daily
  • PEP Lists: Updated daily
  • Regional Sanctions (Panama, etc.): Updated daily
  • Other International Lists: Updated as released by authorities
  • Internal Watchlist: Updated in real-time

You can verify the update date for each list in your search results.

How should I tune match score thresholds?

Threshold tuning depends on your risk appetite and business context:

  • High-Risk Scenarios (90-95+): Use strict thresholds for financial transactions, high-value customers, or sensitive jurisdictions.
  • Standard Compliance (85-90): Recommended for routine KYC and onboarding.
  • Lower-Risk Scenarios (75-85): Use flexible thresholds for internal searches or due diligence (always with manual review).

We recommend starting with the "Strict Match" type at 90+ threshold and adjusting based on your false positive/false negative balance.

Why is COX focused on LATAM?

COX provides specialized support for Latin America compliance:

  • Regional Sources: Includes Panama, Mexico, Colombia, and other regional public sources.
  • Name Matching: Optimized for Spanish and Portuguese names with variations and regional conventions.
  • Local Compliance Language: Adapts to the terminology of each jurisdiction, such as SSNF, PLD, SAGRILAFT, LD/FT and LC/FT/FPADM.
  • Frequent Updates: Regional lists are monitored and updated regularly.
  • Industry Focus: Designed for non-financial obligated businesses, professionals, and small and medium companies in LATAM.

Start screening in minutes

Register today and begin screening customers, suppliers and third parties with audit-ready evidence.

Compliance Solutions for Other Professionals

COX serves multiple regulated industries and professional services.

Law Firms & Notaries

Client verification, list screening, and compliance documentation for legal practices and notarial services.

Learn More

Accountants & Auditors

Due diligence, client onboarding, and compliance reporting for accounting and audit firms.

Learn More

Real Estate Agents

Transaction verification, buyer verification, and compliance for property agents and brokers.

Learn More
Escríbenos por WhatsApp